Resources · Water, sanitation and health

Swachh Bharat Mission and household sanitation in India: where things actually stand

India has declared almost all of its villages free of open defecation. Household surveys tell a more measured story. Both are true, and the difference between them is the most useful thing to understand about sanitation in India today. Every figure on this page carries its source and its date.

Where the numbers stand

The national dashboard, read today

The Swachh Bharat Mission (Grameen) publishes a live national dashboard. It covers rural India — that qualifier matters later on this page. Read on 28 September 2026, with the dashboard itself stamped “As on 28-Sep-2026”, it showed:

Villages covered

5,86,944

Total SBM villages in rural India.

ODF Plus

5,69,852

About 97% of villages, sustaining open-defecation-free status with waste management.

ODF Plus Model

5,25,910

About 90% of villages, meeting the stricter tier.

Household toilets

12,23,20,883

Individual household latrines constructed since 2 October 2014.

SBM-G dashboard, read 28 September 2026. Rural India. Percentages are computed from the counts, not quoted from the dashboard.
MeasureIndiaGujarat
Total villages5,86,94417,973
ODF Plus villages5,69,852 (about 97%)17,812 (about 99%)
ODF Plus Model villages5,25,910 (about 90%)16,163 (about 90%)
Solid waste management5,38,999 villages—
Liquid waste management5,65,764 villages—
These are live counters and they move daily. Between 25 and 28 September 2026 the national ODF Plus count rose by six villages and the household-toilet count by about 18,000. The dated figures further down this page, from the government’s own year-end reviews, are the ones to cite when a stable reference is needed.

Definitions

ODF, ODF Plus and ODF Plus Model are three different things

This is where most coverage of Swachh Bharat goes wrong, so it is worth being precise.

Phase I goal

ODF

Open defecation free. Every household has access to a toilet and no one in the village defecates in the open.

Phase II goal

ODF Plus

The village sustains its ODF status and has arrangements for solid or liquid waste management.

The stricter tier

ODF Plus Model

Sustained ODF status, solid and liquid waste management, visual cleanliness, and display of Swachh Bharat messaging.

The trap in the headlines. The Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation publishes a year-end review each January, and two consecutive editions lead with different measures without flagging the switch. The review of 1 January 2025 (ODF Plus figures as on 27 December 2024) carried the sub-heading “Over 95% Villages In India Declared ODF Plus” — 5,61,422 villages, counting all ODF Plus villages; the same review put ODF Plus Model at 4,02,591, or “over 69%”. The review of 1 January 2026 (figures as on 16 December 2025) carried the sub-heading “Over 83% Villages in India Declared as ODF Plus (Model)” — 4,89,526 declared, 4,15,915 verified, counting ODF Plus Model only. Read carelessly, the pair looks like coverage fell from 95% to 83% in a year. It did not. They count different things, and both rose: ODF Plus Model went from 4,02,591 in December 2024 to 4,89,526 in December 2025, and stood at 5,25,910 on the live dashboard in September 2026. If you see a figure for Swachh Bharat quoted without saying which tier it is, treat it as unusable.

What has been built

The government’s own dated figures

From the Ministry of Jal Shakti’s year-end review published 1 January 2026, with figures as on 16 December 2025, counted since the mission began on 2 October 2014.

Household latrines

Over 12 crore

Individual household latrines (IHHL) constructed.

Community complexes

2.67 lakh

Community sanitary complexes constructed, up from 2.49 lakh a year earlier.

Waste management

5.27 / 5.41 lakh

Villages with solid and with liquid waste management arrangements respectively.

Phase II spending

Rs 93,723.40 cr

Expenditure 2014 to 2025, against an outlay of over Rs 1.40 lakh crore.

Community sanitary complexes rose by roughly 18,000 over the year — though both figures are rounded to the nearest 0.01 lakh, so that difference carries about a thousand either way.
One comparison this page deliberately does not make. It is tempting to set “more than 11.77 crore” household toilets (as on 24 December 2024) against “more than 12 crore” a year later and report roughly 23 lakh new toilets. That subtraction is not valid, and it is worth seeing why, because the same mistake is made constantly with official figures. Both published numbers are floors, not counts. Each says “more than”. If the real December 2024 figure was close to 11.99 crore and the real December 2025 figure was just over 12 crore, the year’s addition would be nearer 1 lakh than 23 lakh. Subtracting one floor from another gives no lower bound and no upper bound — it gives nothing at all. What can honestly be said: the published total as on 16 December 2025 was at least 12 crore, and the live dashboard read on 28 September 2026 stood at 12,23,20,883. Anyone needing the year’s actual change should take it from the dashboard’s own dated readings rather than from two rounded press figures.

The other measurement

What household surveys measure

A village being declared ODF Plus is an administrative declaration about the village. A household survey asks a different question: is an improved sanitation facility actually in use in this household?

NFHS-4 to NFHS-5

49% → 70%

Use of improved sanitation facilities, between 2015-16 and 2019-21.

NFHS-4 to NFHS-5

60% → 78%

Use of a hand-washing facility with soap and water.

The release describes these as measures of “use of” the facilities rather than of households possessing them — a distinction worth keeping, because a toilet that exists and a toilet that is used are not the same measurement.

The honest gap. About 97% of villages are declared ODF Plus. Use of improved sanitation facilities was measured at 70% in NFHS-5. These are not contradictory, and three things separate them before any conclusion is drawn. Different questions, different methods: one is an administrative declaration about a village, the other is a household survey. Different dates: NFHS-5 was fielded in 2019-21, the dashboard is current. Different populations: the SBM-G dashboard is the Grameen dashboard, rural India only, while the NFHS-5 figures quoted here are all-India, covering rural and urban households together — the two are not measuring the same set of people. The gap is still real, and it is where the remaining work is: declaration is not the same as a working toilet in every home, and neither is the same as it still working in five years.

Gujarat

Where the state stands

On the SBM-G dashboard read 28 September 2026, Gujarat had 17,973 villages, of which 17,812 were ODF Plus — about 99%, above the national figure of about 97% — and 16,163 were ODF Plus Model, about 90%, close to the national figure.

So in Gujarat the ODF Plus declaration is close to universal, and the distance still to travel is the Model tier: the roughly 1,649 villages that sustain ODF status but do not yet meet the full solid-and-liquid waste management and visual-cleanliness standard. The state dashboard separately reports 15,097 Gujarat villages verified as ODF Plus Model, 93.36% of those declared, with 8,416 through a second verification.

Practical

What this means if you are looking at your own village or ward

Three things are worth checking, and all three are answerable from public sources.

One

What tier is it declared at?

The SBM-G dashboard reports village-level status. Declared and verified are different columns — in the December 2025 figures, 4,89,526 villages were declared ODF Plus Model and 4,15,915 verified.

Two

Is there a waste arrangement in fact?

ODF Plus requires solid or liquid waste management; ODF Plus Model requires both.

Three

Is every household’s toilet in use?

This is the household question, not the village question, and it is the one the NFHS data suggests is not yet finished.

Scapex Foundation does not run a sanitation programme, and nothing on this page describes work by Scapex. This is a reference page: we maintain it because the numbers are widely misquoted and a correct version is useful.

Questions

Frequently asked questions about Swachh Bharat and sanitation

In rural India, yes by declaration. The Ministry of Jal Shakti’s year-end review published 1 January 2026 states that rural sanitation coverage rose from 39% in 2014 to 100% in 2019, and that by October 2019 all villages across the country had declared themselves ODF. The mission then moved on to the ODF Plus goal: on the SBM-G dashboard read on 28 September 2026, 5,69,852 of 5,86,944 villages — about 97% — were ODF Plus. Household surveys measure something narrower: NFHS-5 (2019-21) found use of improved sanitation facilities at 70%, up from 49% in 2015-16, and that figure is all-India rather than rural only. The declaration is about villages; the survey is about households.

ODF Plus means a village sustains its open-defecation-free status and has solid or liquid waste management arrangements. ODF Plus Model is stricter: sustained ODF status, solid and liquid waste management, visual cleanliness, and display of Swachh Bharat messaging. The two are often quoted interchangeably, which is why headline percentages for Swachh Bharat appear to jump around.

No. The year-end review published 1 January 2025 said “over 95% villages in India declared ODF Plus”, counting all ODF Plus villages. The review published 1 January 2026 said “over 83% villages in India declared as ODF Plus (Model)”, counting only the stricter Model tier. Different measures, not a decline. On the same Model measure, the count rose from 4,02,591 in December 2024 to 4,89,526 in December 2025.

More than 12 crore individual household latrines and 2.67 lakh community sanitary complexes since 2 October 2014, according to the Ministry of Jal Shakti year-end review published 1 January 2026 with figures as on 16 December 2025. The live SBM-G dashboard read on 28 September 2026 showed 12,23,20,883 household toilets constructed. Note that the published press figures are given as “more than” a rounded number, so they should not be subtracted from one another to work out how many were built in a given year.

The government reported expenditure of Rs 93,723.40 crore from 2014 to 2025, against a Phase II outlay of over Rs 1.40 lakh crore, in its year-end review published 1 January 2026.

On the SBM-G dashboard read 28 September 2026, Gujarat had 17,812 of 17,973 villages at ODF Plus — about 99%, above the national figure of about 97% — and 16,163 at ODF Plus Model, about 90%. The remaining distance in Gujarat is largely the Model tier rather than basic ODF Plus status.

Sources. Every figure on this page comes from a government primary source, and figures are dated because several of them move. Swachh Bharat Mission (Grameen) states dashboard, Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Ministry of Jal Shakti — sbm.gov.in, read 28 September 2026, dashboard stamped “As on 28-Sep-2026”, live counters, rural India · Press Information Bureau, 1 January 2026, “Year End Review; Department of Drinking Water & Sanitation”, carrying the sub-heading “Over 83% Villages in India Declared as ODF Plus (Model) under SBM (G)”, figures as on 16 December 2025, also the source for the October 2019 ODF declaration and the rise in rural sanitation coverage from 39% in 2014 to 100% in 2019 — pib.gov.in · Press Information Bureau, 1 January 2025, “Year End Review; Department of Drinking Water & Sanitation”, carrying the sub-heading “Over 95% Villages In India Declared ODF Plus”, ODF Plus figures as on 27 December 2024 and IMIS portal figures as on 24 December 2024 — pib.gov.in · Press Information Bureau, 5 May 2022, release of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019-21) national report — pib.gov.in. Not published here: the “300,000 fewer diarrhoeal deaths” figure carried on the SBM homepage, which is a modelled estimate with no citation to the underlying study; any state-by-state ranking, because the cited releases do not publish one; and any year-on-year change in household toilet numbers, because the published figures are rounded floors and the difference between them is not derivable. Percentages of villages are computed from the published counts and are described as approximate. Verified 28 September 2026. Tell us if something here is out of date.